A prominent Albanian cardiologist, Edvin Prifti, active on social media has claimed, based on citations, that the coronavirus/COVID-19 has a creator: Peter Daszak. He writes:
 |
"The truth has often been hidden, those who defended it suppressed, killed, or ignored, but in the end, it is so stubborn that it triumphs over any intrigue or ignorance. Now, the virus we know as SARS-CoV-2, which caused COVID-19, has a creator, and he is Peter Daszak, the son of a Ukrainian Nazi in World War II, Bohdan Dayshak or Daszak, today the president of EcoHealth Alliance, or as American media call him, the Prophet of Purgatory. Maybe his family origin means nothing, or maybe it means everything?! The truth, which is becoming more apparent every day, has shown that this individual, along with his colleagues in New York and Wuhan, designed the virus in question in 2018 and submitted the 'Defuse' project to DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) in 2017. As has been proven, this project involved creating a chimeric coronavirus through genetic engineering to include the furin cleavage site, making it pathogenic to humans, and then assessing its efficiency on transgenic mice with human genes, effectively the same virus as SARS-CoV-2. This project was not approved by DARPA in 2018.
Peter Daszak admitted this in a Senate hearing in May 2024. He also publicly acknowledged his authorship of the 'Defuse' project, although he denied subsequent events. Fortunately, the Biden administration, through an executive order on May 22, 2024, halted all funding to EcoHealth Alliance. The American Senate, after an investigation, concluded that the pandemic was caused by Daszak making the coronavirus more transmissible but not more deadly. Nonetheless, what we know and has been confirmed is the ideator and designer of this virus, at least since 2018, and the application of this project in Wuhan. Although the technological process may never be fully known, emails from Peter Daszak were found requesting that all materials on artificially produced coronavirus strains in Wuhan be destroyed. Indeed, none were found when the WHO mission was sent to Wuhan for verification, and curiously, the mission's chairman was Peter Daszak himself. The scientific compromise was so great that even the prestigious scientific journal The Lancet published an article by Peter Daszak in 2020 on the natural origin of COVID-19. Laughable and tragic!
Today, American state agencies have decided to act against this man, who is considered in the American press as the eco-fascist of the 21st century. Peter Daszak wrote in 2016 about 'Disease X,' identical to COVID-19. Although what has been proven aligns with our knowledge from the beginning of the pandemic, I remember those individuals, media, and institutions in Albania and worldwide who hysterically declared the opposite irresponsibly. Such a world, which did not listen to the voice of science but of populism, would end in an even greater hysteria—that of global vaccination. Now, scientists worldwide are daily identifying the inexplicable increase in mortality in developed countries since April 2021, precisely after vaccination began. The latest study in the British Medical Journal in June 2024 analyzes 'excess death' or increased mortality after COVID-19.
These recent developments in May and June 2024 show that the truth is coming to the surface, humanity is reacting, and those in charge are reflecting and acting accordingly. History in the future will record this event and attach the names of those dozens of scientists who were eliminated, executed, committed suicide, died under mysterious circumstances, or were imprisoned simply for seeking the truth and finding the proper treatment and cure for COVID-19. It will also carry the names of those who created, designed, and persecuted everyone else! In the end, everyone will account for which side of the barricade for human life they were on! Everything we informed the Albanian public and beyond in 2020 is now coming to light."
This article reflects the controversial and contentious debate surrounding the origins of SARS-CoV-2. While these claims are based on interpretations of recent events and statements, they should be taken with caution and investigated further to separate fact from conjecture.